Troubleshooting Common Issues in SEGGER emSecure SignAndVerifySEGGER emSecure’s SignAndVerify module provides cryptographic signing and verification capabilities tailored for embedded systems. While powerful, developers can encounter a variety of issues during integration and deployment. This article walks through common problems, diagnostics, and step‑by‑step solutions to get SignAndVerify working reliably in your device firmware.
1. Understanding SignAndVerify basics
Before troubleshooting, confirm these fundamentals:
- SignAndVerify performs asymmetric signing (private key) and verification (public key) — ensure you understand which side holds which key.
- Supported algorithms and key formats — check your chosen algorithm (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) and key encoding (DER, PEM, raw) match emSecure expectations.
- Secure key storage — private keys should be stored in secure element or protected MCU flash regions; public keys can be distributed with firmware or bootloader.
2. Common symptom: signatures fail verification
Symptoms: the signer produces a signature, but verification on the device (or on host) returns failure.
Checklist and fixes:
- Algorithm mismatch — ensure both signer and verifier use the same algorithm and curve (e.g., both use ECDSA P-256). Mismatched curves or RSA vs ECDSA will always fail.
- Hashing differences — confirm the signer and verifier hash the same data with the same hash function (SHA‑256, SHA‑384, etc.). If you sign the raw message but verify a hashed message, the results will differ.
- Message canonicalization — ensure identical byte representation: encoding, line endings, padding, or metadata differences will change the digest. For JSON, use deterministic serialization (sorted keys) before signing.
- Key format/endianness — verify the public key loaded into the verifier matches the private key used to generate signatures; check byte order and coordinate layout for EC keys (raw X||Y vs. ASN.1).
- Signature format — ECDSA signatures may be returned as ASN.1 (DER) or raw (r||s). Ensure the verifier expects the same format or convert as needed.
- Truncated or corrupted signature data — check buffers and lengths; ensure the full signature bytes are transmitted/stored. Use explicit length fields rather than relying on string terminators.
- RNG problems (signer side) — ECDSA requires good randomness for k values; deterministic ECDSA (RFC 6979) avoids RNG but if using random k, ensure a cryptographically secure RNG.
Diagnostics:
- Re-sign a known test vector and verify locally using OpenSSL or a known-good library.
- Print/compare hash digests before signing and before verification.
- Dump keys and signature in hex and compare expected formats.
3. Common symptom: key import/load failures
Symptoms: APIs return errors when importing keys or initialization returns failure.
Checklist and fixes:
- Key encoding mismatch — ensure the key data encoded (PEM/DER/raw) matches the API function’s expected format. Convert PEM to DER if required.
- Wrong API call — use the correct emSecure function for importing private vs public keys. Some APIs require separate import for secure element handles vs raw buffers.
- Key size unsupported — verify that key lengths and curves are supported by your firmware build of emSecure.
- Memory constraints — importing large keys or certificate chains may fail if heap/stack is insufficient. Increase memory or stream keys from storage.
- Permission/secure element locks — if keys are stored in secure hardware, ensure access permissions and provisioning state allow use.
- Corrupt key blob — check for truncation, wrong line endings, or base64 decode errors when converting PEM.
Diagnostics:
- Test importing a minimal known-good key pair (e.g., test ECDSA P-256 key) supplied by emSecure examples.
- Use API return codes and logs; enable debug logging in emSecure if available.
4. Common symptom: performance or timing issues
Symptoms: signing or verification is too slow, or causes watchdog resets.
Checklist and fixes:
- Crypto hardware vs software fallback — ensure hardware accelerator is enabled and drivers are configured. Software-only crypto on constrained MCUs can be slow.
- Stack/heap usage — crypto operations may require temporary buffers. Increase stack or heap for the calling task.
- Watchdog handling — long crypto ops should periodically kick or run within a context that disables watchdog, or move to a background task.
- Interrupt priorities — ensure crypto drivers and interrupts are configured to avoid preemption issues that stall operation.
- Algorithm choice — ECDSA with P‑521 or RSA‑4096 will be significantly slower; consider a performance/size tradeoff (e.g., P‑256).
Diagnostics:
- Measure time using cycle counters or timestamps to find hotspots.
- Compare hardware-accelerated vs software path using build-time options or runtime detection.
5. Common symptom: firmware integration/build errors
Symptoms: build fails with missing symbols, link errors, or runtime crashes after adding emSecure.
Checklist and fixes:
- Library selection — include the correct emSecure library variant for your target (e.g., Cortex‑M vs simulator build).
- Compiler flags — enable required flags (optimization level, floating-point ABI) consistent with the emSecure binary. Mismatched ABI can cause crashes.
- Linker script — ensure memory regions for secure keys or stack are defined; some modules expect specific sections (.secure_data, .dtb, etc.).
- Version compatibility — confirm the emSecure version matches other middleware/SDK expectations (TLS stacks, secure element drivers).
- Thread-safety — use proper mutexes when calling emSecure APIs from multiple threads if the library isn’t inherently reentrant.
- Initialization order — call crypto initialization before other modules that rely on it (RNG, secure storage).
Diagnostics:
- Reproduce with minimal project: start from emSecure example and incrementally add your app until the failure appears.
- Enable compiler/linker verbose output to trace missing symbols and object files.
6. Common symptom: interoperability with other libraries (TLS, bootloader)
Symptoms: Signatures produced by emSecure are rejected by another library or vice versa.
Checklist and fixes:
- Ensure identical key representations and signature encodings between libraries (DER vs raw r||s).
- Confirm the same hash algorithm and any associated OID/algorithm identifiers used in signatures or CMS structures.
- When working with certificates, verify chain validation steps and trust anchors are consistent.
- For secure boot, ensure bootloader verifies the exact byte ranges that were signed (including any headers, padding, or version fields).
Diagnostics:
- Use OpenSSL or a small test program to verify signatures and key pairs independently of both implementations.
- Compare the exact bytes hashed on both sides.
7. Secure element (SE) specific issues
Symptoms: Keys in the SE produce errors, or signing times are inconsistent.
Checklist and fixes:
- SE provisioning — ensure keys were provisioned in the correct slot and with the correct attributes (signing allowed, export disabled).
- APDU/transport issues — confirm correct command sequences and platform-specific wrappers when sending requests to the SE.
- Firmware/driver compatibility — the SE’s firmware or driver version may require matching emSecure drivers.
- Timeout and power management — ensure the SE isn’t suspended or power-gated during operations.
- Key handle lifecycle — some SEs return transient handles; treat them per the SE’s lifecycle rules.
Diagnostics:
- Use vendor test tools to exercise the SE directly.
- Log APDU/transport traffic to spot malformed requests or status codes.
8. Debugging tips and tools
- Enable emSecure debug logs (if available) and set log level to verbose for initial troubleshooting.
- Use OpenSSL or similar tools to verify keys, signatures, and test vectors.
- Add hex dumps of keys, signatures, and hashes to your debug output.
- Compare inputs and outputs between signer and verifier with byte-for-byte comparison.
- Reproduce failures with minimal, deterministic test cases to rule out environmental factors.
9. Example checklist to resolve a failing verification
- Confirm algorithm and curve: both signer and verifier use ECDSA P‑256 and SHA‑256.
- Verify signature format: both sides expect and produce DER-encoded ECDSA signatures (or both use raw r||s).
- Compute and compare hash of the exact same byte sequence on both ends.
- Dump and compare public/private key bytes (X||Y) to ensure they match.
- Test signature against OpenSSL: sign with the signer, verify with OpenSSL (or vice versa).
- Check RNG or use deterministic ECDSA (RFC 6979) to eliminate randomness issues.
- Ensure full signature bytes are transmitted/stored (verify lengths and buffer limits).
10. When to contact SEGGER support
Contact SEGGER support when:
- You confirm a reproducible bug in emSecure after testing with their examples.
- You encounter hardware-specific issues tied to supported secure elements or SoCs.
- You need clarification on undocumented behavior or advanced configuration options.
Include in your support ticket:
- Minimal reproduction project or step-by-step repro instructions.
- Exact emSecure version, target MCU/SE, toolchain versions, and build flags.
- Hex dumps of keys, signatures, and hashes (if not secret) or redacted equivalents.
- API return codes and verbose logs.
Troubleshooting SignAndVerify usually narrows down to mismatched formats (algorithm, hash, or signature encoding), key handling errors, or environment/resource constraints. Systematic verification with test vectors, hex dumps, and hardware diagnostics will identify most issues quickly.